This is a block in Chicago’s urban core, on State Street, in the Loop:
We’re looking specifically at the block with the three buildings: a two- or three-story retail building on the left, an asymmetrical tall building, and then a plainer looking tall building.
This looks like a lot of old blocks in older cities. The block I used to work on in D.C. kind of looked like this. One building was historic; the other two that used to abut it were newer, but they still formed a coherent urban block. It wouldn’t surprise you that something else once stood where the low-rise retail building is today. Almost any time you see a low-rise building, or especially a parking lot mixed in with big, tall, distinctly urban buildings, you’re looking at a hole in an old streetscape.
Here is the block many decades ago, thanks to a tweet from a Chicago urbanist:
It’s a shame that the lovely building on the left—demolished in 1959, in a period when a lot of late-19th-century buildings came down in the old cities—is gone. The building on the right survives pretty much exactly as it was.
What’s quite curious, though, is the building in the middle. It’s still standing, but it’s been altered in a very odd way! Look closely:
Somehow, several stories have been shaved off of the left side! Notice that it looks like even the back half lost those stories somehow, meaning—as far as I can tell—that the left side of the structure has been completely rebuilt, with even the matching left-wall windows being new, since previously all of that was a party wall. It kind of looks to me like the missing stories begin where this center building abutted the old tall building on the left. So perhaps it was damaged in the 1959 demolition?
Here’s a sort of top-down view. You can see the building has a lot of shape, which it doesn’t look like it did originally, though we can’t see the back in that old illustration. Also, the brick wall you can see on the side is probably left over from the demolished building.
Stuff like this is really curious to me. It doesn’t seem like it should be possible to do that kind of surgery on a big tall building without compromising the structure in some way. But if you look at enough old photos and histories, you’ll actually see it’s not that rare for buildings to lose a few stories or otherwise be altered in strange ways but remain standing. Check out the middle “Related Reading” link for a particularly weird example in Washington, D.C.
It’s cool, though, that this Chicago block still looks like a city block, as, in a location like this, it should.
Related Reading:
What Do You Think You’re Looking At? #8
Thank you for reading! Please consider upgrading to a paid subscription to help support this newsletter. You’ll get a weekly subscribers-only piece, plus full access to the archive: over 1,000 pieces and growing. And you’ll help ensure more like this!
Boo used to live just a few blocks away; I can't tell you how many times I've seen those buildings. Cheers!
Just thinking about why so many 19th century buildings got torn down in the 50s. That was when the glass office tower was coming in. It was also a time when new was vastly preferable—“Drive new every two." You couldn't impress a new client by asking them to visit you in a 19th century office building— I can just imagine the yellowing paint and the grimy woodwork. It certainly would have taken almost as much money to thoroughly rehab a 19th century building as it would be to build a steel framed, thinned skinned replacement.
I don't think central AC was a thing yet, so that was not it.