The Intersection That Taught Me Critical Theory
Things like short walk timers and unplowed sidewalks are a form of inequality
Snow seems to inspire urbanists and land-use folks; it occasions a lot of commentary on the built environment. There’s the phenomenon of “sneckdowns”—when snow effectively reduces the width of a road, often revealing that all that width isn’t necessary and could be better utilized. There’s commentary like this, pointing out something that never occurred to me: a lot of what makes a snow day peaceful and quiet is the relative absence of motor traffic:
And then there’s what inspired this headline: the fact that despite both being public rights of way, the sidewalks often don’t get plowed as reliably as the roads—or worse, the sidewalks are used as a dumping space for plowed snow.
There’s a tendency sometimes for urbanist/pedestrian advocacy language to sound vaguely Marxist, in the sense that it looks at motorists and pedestrians in the same frame as Marxists look at capitalists and workers (I wrote about that at more length here). When I first started following this stuff, honestly this turned me off a bit.
For example, sometimes you’ll see stuff like this, a genre of tweet I dislike a lot, usually where a wife uses her husband to make a political point at his expense:
In the replies, someone compares this—not being able to understand how dangerous walking or biking can be, if they don’t regularly do it—to being a white person trying to understand being black in America.
Well, that isn’t going to do much to help make urban design issues palatable to certain conservatives. But I’ve come to see that this critical theory/quasi-Marxist frame of analysis is in fact a useful way of analyzing how people utilize the built environment. Because if people who walk and bike—who have a full right to the right of way—nonetheless find their infrastructure poorly maintained and their ease of travel and even their lives threatened, doesn’t that issue transcend mere individual choices?
In other words, this is what got me to stop seeing this kind of commentary as left-wing politicking and as to start seeing it as accurate and descriptive:
This might look navigable, which it is, if like me you’re young and able-bodied. Even then it’s a chore. But if you’re old, are in a wheelchair or using a cast, are walking somewhere with a stroller or young children, etc., it’s pretty much impassable. If this is not an issue for you, it’s probably because you don’t need to navigate this landscape. Walking infrastructure is poor, so those who have a choice avoid it, making the problem less visible to them, and also making it into something of a class issue.
In summer, the same thing happens except instead of snow, it’s overgrown weeds or tree branches cutting into the sidewalk. Here, for good measure, is a bit of sidewalk where the unlucky pedestrian is sandwiched between three lanes of cars breezing by at 50 miles per hour on one side, and a guardrail on the other.
Take a look at this. I’ve driven through the intersection below dozens of times. It’s a crowded, tricky, and not very fun to drive, and it’s also in the middle of an area where a lot of people walk to go shopping. This is the tragic result. These are not isolated incidents reducible to bad individual choices, whether by the motorist or the pedestrian; there’s a concerning year-over-year increase in pedestrian fatalities going on in this country.
I used to think that talking about these issues in the language of class or inequality was reading ideology into reality. But I now realize that if your only response to this is “people should watch where they’re walking,” you’re missing a lot of what is actually happening.
Related Reading:
Please consider upgrading to a paid subscription to help support this newsletter. You’ll get a weekend subscribers-only post, plus full access to the archive of over 200 posts and growing. And you’ll help ensure more material like this!
I clicked on this mainly bc I am supposed to be writing my post for Friday, and I don't want to. So I clicked here and now I am fully in the fabbit-hole. I curse you and Thank You. You are 100% right. Car owners probably could care less about pedestrians. I know what I speak of:
I was the PED in an Auto-PED accident. That's "Automobile-Pedestrian accident causing harm". Not hard to guess who got harmed. Not the vehicle, although I left my body impression on the bed of the truck.
I am ready to write now, you are amazing. I am so glad I read your stuff. Keep it up
Ric
I was very surprised when I bought my hosue to discover that, in my city, residents are responsible for clearing the sidewalk in front of the house of snow and ice. Grumbled a bit but dutifully bought a shovel and some salt. First snow really opened my eyes because my street is on a slope and the old and the young slip and crash on the way downhill. Not safe. Yes, I wish the city would do it but there are some compensations to doing our duty: as we clear the snow and ice, people stop to talk and to thank us.